This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 6, 2023. It is now read-only.
Issue #33: Add jq to Dockerfile #154
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
philippeboyd
force-pushed
the
feature/add-jq
branch
from
8b18acc
to
7469dca
Compare
philippeboyd
force-pushed
the
feature/add-jq
branch
from
7469dca
to
074cf60
Compare
|
Looking at commit 02af941, why was |
|
I believe the version of jq available in the repos at the time had known security issues. |
|
Either that or Alpine 3.6, which it moved to at the same time, didn't have |
grigorov
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2020
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Seems like issue #33 hasn't been fix properly. I agree that
jqshould be part of the docker image. It's really helpful to parse json formatted secrets.