Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look into using Terraform sensitive attribute #85

Closed
lornasong opened this issue Sep 25, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #181
Closed

Look into using Terraform sensitive attribute #85

lornasong opened this issue Sep 25, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #181
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@lornasong
Copy link
Member

Terraform feature to add sensitive attribute to variables is currently slated for version 0.14. This allows adding a sensitive attribute to variables which will prevent outputting those variable values during plan. This will be helpful for read-only mode and potentially elsewhere.

@eikenb eikenb added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 17, 2020
@findkim
Copy link
Contributor

findkim commented Jan 20, 2021

This would be very impactful to declare the intermediate provider variables as sensitive (example). It won't prevent it being stored in the state files, but will omit them from Terraform output and logs

@findkim findkim self-assigned this Feb 3, 2021
@findkim findkim added this to the v0.1.0 Beta milestone Feb 3, 2021
sarahethompson added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 6, 2023
* clean up changes include fixing push event, changing from master to main, and adding eula zips.
updating product/repo names and updating artifact names to reflect product name

* linux package names should match the repo name

* bad merge

* adding back release branch regex

Co-authored-by: Claire Labry <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants