Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add jvm algorithm analysis flag for latitude example #1093

Merged
merged 58 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

alex-kuzmin-hg
Copy link
Contributor

@alex-kuzmin-hg alex-kuzmin-hg commented Jan 2, 2025

Description

This pull request changes the following:

  • add jvm algorithm analysis flag for latitude example

Related Issues

  • Closes #

Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Unit Test Results - Linux

  1 files  ±0   58 suites  ±0   3s ⏱️ ±0s
227 tests ±0  227 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
232 runs  ±0  232 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit de28ae5. ± Comparison against base commit 8753723.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Unit Test Results - Windows

  1 files  ±0   58 suites  ±0   14s ⏱️ ±0s
227 tests ±0  227 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
232 runs  ±0  232 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit de28ae5. ± Comparison against base commit 8753723.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

E2E Test Report

 16 files  ±0  121 suites  ±0   1h 20m 41s ⏱️ +28s
258 tests ±0  258 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
261 runs  ±0  261 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 147ab67. ± Comparison against base commit aa4b3d3.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

E2E Test Report

 16 files  121 suites   1h 20m 39s ⏱️
258 tests 258 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
261 runs  261 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 613b60a.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 5180a761
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (5180a76) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (613b60a) 20724 17480 84.35%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#1093) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.55%. Comparing base (ed6527b) to head (613b60a).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1093      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.67%   83.55%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          77       77              
  Lines       20634    20724      +90     
  Branches     1397     1666     +269     
==========================================
+ Hits        17265    17315      +50     
- Misses       3326     3331       +5     
- Partials       43       78      +35     

see 33 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon changed the title Solo charts 0.38.2 chore: Solo charts 0.38.2 Jan 3, 2025
Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
@alex-kuzmin-hg alex-kuzmin-hg marked this pull request as draft January 5, 2025 23:51
@alex-kuzmin-hg
Copy link
Contributor Author

this branch is just for my own debugging/experiments. Not ready to review yet. I will clean it up of delete when done

jeromy-cannon and others added 19 commits January 11, 2025 16:05
Signed-off-by: Alex Kuzmin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>
… cert-manager, then do an upgrade with that in isolation, then do another upgrade for the stuff that depends on it

Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon changed the title chore: Solo charts 0.38.2 chore: add jvm algorithm analysis flag for latitude example Jan 13, 2025
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 17:07
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon merged commit 4ebae5d into main Jan 13, 2025
17 of 23 checks passed
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon deleted the solo-charts-0.38.2 branch January 13, 2025 17:13
@swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.33.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.33.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants