Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation for Firefox extension update process #3682

Conversation

cmsetzer
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsetzer cmsetzer commented Jan 7, 2025

This adds a readme and a .gitignore to support future updates to the Perma.cc Firefox extension.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.67%. Comparing base (ffa57fa) to head (7b29ae1).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3682   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    69.67%   69.67%           
========================================
  Files           54       54           
  Lines         7661     7661           
========================================
  Hits          5338     5338           
  Misses        2323     2323           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cmsetzer cmsetzer merged commit aa77480 into harvard-lil:develop Jan 8, 2025
2 checks passed
@cmsetzer cmsetzer deleted the document-firefox-extension-update-process branch January 8, 2025 02:20
Copy link
Contributor

@rebeccacremona rebeccacremona left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this documentation... including explaining how the extension should work lol! Future us will be very grateful!

Sorry I didn't review before merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants