-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 619
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trc file writer add version param #1924
Open
pkess
wants to merge
12
commits into
hardbyte:main
Choose a base branch
from
pkess:trc_file_writer_add_version_param
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
44bf3de
Add format lookup map
pkess e99bc00
Remove format message init stuff
pkess 132a93d
Add function for setup of file version
pkess 406b278
Add file version as init parameter
pkess e736744
Add missing import
pkess 39f3c8f
Add type hints for format message
pkess 6192308
Add docstring for new parameter
pkess 39e8a01
Fix test case for expicit file version
pkess d696018
Add None handling for first_timestamp
pkess e4efeb2
Add return type hint
pkess 5a142c2
Add documentation for TRCFileVersion
pkess 2c9019e
Fix ref
pkess File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
instance attributes should be set in
__init__
. You could have version and format string as return values of a static method or just remove this method and put the try/except block into__init__
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok. The branch where i picked this from handled it with a tuple returned. I think this does not improve readability.
As this method is invoked from the init function it is always ensured that the attributes are initialized. Can you tell my why it should be added explicit in init?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's just a good practice, and it helps with code completion since IDEs usually look into
__init__
for instance attributes.I wonder why pylint is silent, there's a rule for this: https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/messages/warning/attribute-defined-outside-init.html 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I googled a bit for this and it seems like the only requirement is that all attributes are already initialized after the init function was executed. It is not enforced that the assignment is inside of the init function. So for me it looks like the approach here is correct.
I prefer to try to make a function implementation fit on one or two screen page. With this implementation we are quite prepared for more additions and changes not to blow up the function.
If we return a tuple we would achieve the same that is correct, but i think it is better readable like this.
So please take another look and tell me your thoughts.