Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow multi-worker capabilities with gunicorn wrapper/worker args #105

Closed
sellnat77 opened this issue Nov 27, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Allow multi-worker capabilities with gunicorn wrapper/worker args #105

sellnat77 opened this issue Nov 27, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
@GeorgeSu
Labels
Complexity: Missing This ticket needs a complexity (good first issue, small, medium, or large) Enhancement New feature or request Milestone: Missing Role: Backend Related to API or other server-side work size: Missing v1 The first version of the site

Comments

@sellnat77
Copy link
Member

sellnat77 commented Nov 27, 2019 •
edited by GeorgeSu
Loading

Overview

Put the existing sanic application behind a gunicorn wrapper to enable multi-worker deployment
OR
Utilize the workers argument to app.run to allow asynchronicity with Sanic
@sellnat77 sellnat77 added Enhancement New feature or request Role: Backend Related to API or other server-side work labels Nov 27, 2019
@itsjoycelee itsjoycelee reopened this Jan 8, 2020
@sellnat77 sellnat77 changed the title Allow multi-worker capabilities with gunicorn wrapper Allow multi-worker capabilities with gunicorn wrapper/worker args Jan 15, 2020
sellnat77 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 15, 2020
@sellnat77
Merge pull request #176 from GeorgeSu/105-BACK-Async
418f9f9 
Issue #105
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done (without merge) in P: 311: Project Board Aug 22, 2024
@Rabia2219 Rabia2219 added the v1 The first version of the site label Aug 22, 2024
@cottonchristopher cottonchristopher added the Complexity: Missing This ticket needs a complexity (good first issue, small, medium, or large) label Feb 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@GeorgeSu GeorgeSu

Labels
Complexity: Missing This ticket needs a complexity (good first issue, small, medium, or large) Enhancement New feature or request Milestone: Missing Role: Backend Related to API or other server-side work size: Missing v1 The first version of the site
Projects
P: 311: Project Board
Status: Done (without merge)
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@sellnat77 @GeorgeSu @ExperimentsInHonesty @itsjoycelee @Rabia2219 @cottonchristopher