Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 29, 2023. It is now read-only.

Fix: pod secondary range name should not be same as service secondary range name #121

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 21, 2021

Conversation

robmorgan
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes #118 by forcing the gke-cluster module to use var.services_secondary_range_name instead of defaulting to var.cluster_secondary_range_name. It also adds additional vpc-network options to each example in order to support backwards compatibility.

ina-stoyanova
ina-stoyanova previously approved these changes Apr 20, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@ina-stoyanova ina-stoyanova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, Rob!

@ina-stoyanova
Copy link
Contributor

Wow, great spot!

Copy link
Contributor

@ina-stoyanova ina-stoyanova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@robmorgan robmorgan merged commit c174b3a into master Apr 21, 2021
@robmorgan robmorgan deleted the brianpham-master branch April 21, 2021 01:29
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

IpAllocation Policy - Secondary Range Names
3 participants