-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes GFN-FF bug for specific pi systems #836
Conversation
Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <[email protected]>
This bug also hits a test system. I changed the test accordingly, but we should double-check this before merging. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is more useful to make this check truly informative only without affecting the outcome of the calculation.
This would be indeed the case, if the effect on the calculation was not planned. However, I was under the assumption, that the second attempt was the intended option for this particular scenario. If this is not the case, we can just make sure, that this routine does not overwrite the |
Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <[email protected]>
After consultation with Stefan Grimme, the effect on the outcome of the calculation seems to be indeed the intended option. However, I changed the fermi temperature to be consistent with the default case. This is therefore ready to be merged now. |
Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <[email protected]>
* Fixes GFN-FF bug for specific pi systems Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <[email protected]>
* Fixes GFN-FF bug for specific pi systems Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Gorges <[email protected]>
Closes #835.