Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

More flexible forecastables #116

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 7, 2021
Merged

More flexible forecastables #116

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 7, 2021

Conversation

bknueven
Copy link
Collaborator

@bknueven bknueven commented Sep 14, 2021 •
edited
Loading

These changes are to enable direct running of RTS-GMLC, including ancillary service product. Requires grid-parity-exchange/Egret#245.

Major changes, all of which involve changing how we handle "forecastables":

  1. Broadening forecastables: these can now be any thing specified as a time series using the rts-gmlc format. In general, we consider things with time-series to be "forecastable".
  2. Reserves, or other forecastables, may exist in the "forecast" stage but not the "actuals" stage. This is necessary for reserve products which act purely in the forecast stage to deal with actuals uncertainty.

bknueven
bknueven commented Oct 7, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bknueven bknueven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The extra documentation is really nice, in addition to the changes we discussed.

@darrylmelander darrylmelander merged commit fbcdb3d into grid-parity-exchange:main Oct 7, 2021
@bknueven bknueven deleted the rtsgmlc branch October 7, 2021 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@darrylmelander darrylmelander darrylmelander approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@bknueven @darrylmelander