Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove doubled cache instruction #44

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

shuryoka
Copy link
Contributor

yaml file parsers are marking the cache instruction as doubled - this commit removes the second ocurrance as it is an exact copy of the first one

yaml file parsers are marking the cache instruction as doubled - this commit removes the second ocurrance as it is an exact copy of the first one
@ribalba
Copy link
Member

ribalba commented Oct 13, 2023

@dan-mm could you please take a look. I think we needed the caching for venv?

@ribalba ribalba requested a review from dan-mm October 13, 2023 07:25
Copy link
Contributor

@dan-mm dan-mm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aye the second cache path looks like an oversight, thank you for catching it! I tested this out and it looks good to me.

Only question I have is that this also included the addition of an explicit copy of the eco-ci output from the temp directory into the root directory. AFAIK this shouldn't be needed - am I missing something?

- cp /tmp/eco-ci/output.txt ./eco-ci-output.txt
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm curious why this was added here - was it needed?

@dan-mm
Copy link
Contributor

dan-mm commented Oct 13, 2023

@ribalba - the caching is still there, what was removed was an unnecessary duplicate

@ArneTR
Copy link
Member

ArneTR commented Oct 13, 2023

LGTM. Just talked to Didi, was just a visual oversight from him. Can be merged

@dan-mm dan-mm merged commit 73fb104 into green-coding-solutions:main Oct 16, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants