-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ISSUE 64] python plugin : refactoring and corrections #77
Conversation
Just by curiosity, why do you remove all the Json for all the rules? I think it was clearer with them than having all the rules properties in the source code. It is just my advice though. |
@jhertout |
OK, thanks. It was to know what is the good way to proceed for our rules. We will do without the json. |
@jhertout, |
Yes, we will do without the json only for the Python rules. We will keep the json for the other plugins. I think it is a better way to do when we can. Since we need our Python rule before the hackaton, I can't wait a potential refactor. We will create the json later during the python project refactor if necessary. |
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. |
As mentionned on ISSUE 64, python rules system was not OK since our upgrade of lib versions and for SonarQube 9.9.
Done on python plugin :
eco-conception
toeco-design
(as recommended in an other issue)