-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 831
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add icon for shop=books #1311
add icon for shop=books #1311
Conversation
Tester recognizes icon as books. |
Tester recognizes icon as books. Maybe it would be a good idea to have the same icon in two colours for shop=books and library? |
This could work as shops have a quite distinct colour. But if we succeed in creating two different recognisable icons this would be better. See also #1228 (comment) for remaining issues I have with an updated version of the library icon. |
@nebulon42 It would be better to avoid reordering names in defition of shop name. On topic of adding new icon - I suppport it, bookstores are common shop type. Currently most mappers in Poland specify that shop is bookstore, as otherwise in default rendering it is impossible to guess shop type. Separate icon should fix the biggest source of this poor tagging. |
What issues do you see with that? I thought it would be better to have it ordered alphabetically for quick overview. |
Maybe, but it would be better as a separate commit - or even better a separate PR. This way it is easier to check and ensure that nothing goes wrong. |
Nice icon! |
removed reordering of shop name definitions. |
@gravitystorm This also needs a strategic decision. Do we want to add more icons for shoptypes we currently only render as dot? Personally I support more icons as long as they are rezognizable, but I know you are more hesitant on this aspect. |
@gravitystorm @pnorman What is your opinion? Is anybody opposed to adding more icons for shops? Currently I am planning to merge it in a near future. |
I would love to add special icon for every possible type - visual hints work very good. Regarding this icon: @daganzdaanda is right about making it more solid, but given the choice current proposition or just a standard dot, I would take the first one for sure. Not visually perfect, but still recognizable. |
Nobody opposed, so as far as I'm concerned we merge this. |
Updated. |
I'm iffy on adding more icons. Slightly less so on shop icons. |
Why? If they aren't visible too early, I see no problem with more icons. As a matter of fact in micromapping we lack many of them - including shops, but if we care only for them, we would be not much better than Google Maps with their clear commercial attitude. |
@nebulon42 Can you rebase it? I want to merge this PR. |
@nebulon42 Also, why yaml and mml files are modified? EDIT: I see, it is necessary as currently shop=books is currently translated to shop=other in SQL query. |
Rebased. |
Thanks! |
Something probably went wrong a bit, since the icon seems to be rendered for areas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289091540 but not for the nodes (just created, so that can't be old dot): |
Preview:
