refactoring amenity-points #1059
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I have tested this pull request, and I think it can be merged. |
|
I think this should PR should get priority in being merged, as there is a lot of further work being blocked by this PR. |
gravitystorm
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2014
refactoring amenity-points
19 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
some obvious changes that are subset of #710 and cleanup after #695
minor changes in rendering (generic shop names are no longer rendered as larger than normal shop labels, bar and cinema now inherit properties (for example bar names are now wrapping).