-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 819
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minimum number of oneway arrows #595
Comments
I'm actually not sure why no southern arrow renders on z18? |
A few blue pixels are visible under the "Vom" (mostly hidden by the text's halo), which is about 160px from the other arrow. Note also that the road is oneway=-1 (the beginning of the way, where the first arrow is placed, is at the north end). |
Reopening (false closed by commit message). |
Unless @matkoniecz can perhaps confirm this is indeed solved? |
According to my tests it is not solved. |
Sorry, did not know that Github could misinterpret the "might fix ...". |
Github probably detected "fix ..." and ignored "might". |
In #3890 @dieterdreist again notes that short roads do not get oneway arrows placed. This is because since #1840 in September 2015 they are rendered from svg icons with:
The arrows for paths are rendered as a text symbol, but with the same line placement and spacing. This means that if the total length of the line is less than 90 pixels (half the spacing), no arrow will be placed. If In the past, before #1840, oneway arrows were rendered as a raster line pattern, and we had the issue of them appearing too soon, near the beginning of a way. See #284 It might be possible to remove the Any ideas on how to achieve that technically? Is the length of way recorded already, similar to |
The following issue has been moved over from trac. It needs more discussion as it is not clear how this should be implemented.
Please make sure there is a minimum number of oneway arrows visible (on high zoom levels).
E.g. here on the oneway street "Vom-Rath-Straße" there is only one arrow at the north end that can be overlooked easily. In high zoom levels (17,18) there is enough space for a(n) additional arrows(s) e.g. at the south end.
Alternatively you may consider drawing a more transparent arrow under the street name - but only if there is not enough space for the previous solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: