You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I suggest a change for the bright red color that the highway=steps has at the moment. Ever since the building color was changed, the steps look to strident, especially in areas where there are lots of such roads (example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/37.44711/24.94306 ).
This kind of red is more fitted for restrictions (e.g. access=no tags) or important roads.
At z15 they look even more strange.
As to what color should they have... don't know, perhaps something near the color of pedestrian roads.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
i think step is logical linked to footway. changing both would be a major change. Making footway and pedestrian similar seems good, but footway has to be visible on forest and other landuses.
Change of colour is a poor idea, but it is possible to reduce visibility of highway=steps (just a bit, this feature should be still noticeable). I tested some versions and reducing width seems to be the best solution.
I suggest a change for the bright red color that the highway=steps has at the moment. Ever since the building color was changed, the steps look to strident, especially in areas where there are lots of such roads (example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/37.44711/24.94306 ).
This kind of red is more fitted for restrictions (e.g. access=no tags) or important roads.
At z15 they look even more strange.
As to what color should they have... don't know, perhaps something near the color of pedestrian roads.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: