You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just discovered that the bonus form will not accept a leadin of more than 500 characters. I guess this is a check on people accidentally pasting a tossup or garbage in there, since obviously no bonus leadin should ever be that long. However, I was trying to include a bracketed "note to moderator" about the question, which put it over the limit. While I can certainly live without that on this particular set, it would be better for decisions on part length to be set by editors and not hard-coded in the system.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 12:01 AM mweiner1 ***@***.***> wrote:
I just discovered that the bonus form will not accept a leadin of more
than 500 characters. I guess this is a check on people accidentally pasting
a tossup or garbage in there, since obviously no bonus leadin should ever
be that long. However, I was trying to include a bracketed "note to
moderator" about the question, which put it over the limit. While I can
certainly live without that on this particular set, it would be better for
decisions on part length to be set by editors and not hard-coded in the
system.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#387>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEI4KKSXT7BMZXQHHUV3KTWCJUS5ANCNFSM6AAAAAARASHFQI>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
I just discovered that the bonus form will not accept a leadin of more than 500 characters. I guess this is a check on people accidentally pasting a tossup or garbage in there, since obviously no bonus leadin should ever be that long. However, I was trying to include a bracketed "note to moderator" about the question, which put it over the limit. While I can certainly live without that on this particular set, it would be better for decisions on part length to be set by editors and not hard-coded in the system.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: