Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: optimize make commands #597

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024
Merged

chore: optimize make commands #597

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl commented Aug 12, 2024

📑 Description

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a streamlined approach for creating various command types (e.g., policies, factories, models) using a new supportconsole.NewMake function, enhancing clarity and reducing complexity in command handling.
    • Added Listener() method to the Stubs struct for improved event handling capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling and output expectations for command creation and stub population.
  • Refactor

    • Removed unnecessary methods related to path handling and name parsing, consolidating logic for improved maintainability across multiple command types.
    • Shifted to an object-oriented design in the console package with the introduction of the Make type, improving code organization.
  • Documentation

    • Improved code organization and test structure for better clarity and maintainability of the Make functionality in the console package.

✅ Checks

  • Added test cases for my code

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2024 13:02
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a comprehensive refactoring of various command structures across the application, enhancing clarity, maintainability, and efficiency in handling creation operations for components such as policies, models, events, and more. A central theme is the implementation of the supportconsole.NewMake method, which consolidates logic for name retrieval and file path construction, streamlining the code by reducing reliance on multiple helper methods and improving parameter handling during stub population.

Changes

Files and Summary
auth/console/policy_make_command.go, console/console/make_command.go, database/console/factory_make_command.go, database/console/model_make_command.go, database/console/observer_make_command.go, database/console/seeder_make_command.go, event/console/event_make_command.go, event/console/listener_make_command.go, foundation/console/test_make_command.go, http/console/controller_make_command.go, http/console/middleware_make_command.go, http/console/request_make_command.go, mail/console/mail_make_command.go, queue/console/job_make_command.go, validation/console/filter_make_command.go, validation/console/rule_make_command.go: Refactored to utilize the unified supportconsole.NewMake function for command handling, simplifying structure and reducing complexity. Method signatures updated to accept packageName and structName, enhancing clarity in stub population while removing unused methods like getPath and parseName.
support/console/console.go: Introduced a new Make type that encapsulates functionalities for command creation. Replaced the GetName function with NewMake, improving management of names and paths. Added methods for retrieving file and package names, enhancing modularity and readability.
support/console/console_test.go: Transitioned to a suite-based testing structure for better organization. Added test methods for new functionalities in the Make class, improving clarity and maintainability of tests.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Console
    participant Make

    User->>Console: Create Command
    Console->>Make: NewMake(params)
    Make-->>Console: Return FilePath, StructName
    Console->>User: Command Created
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant OldConsole
    participant OldMake

    User->>OldConsole: Create Command
    OldConsole->>OldMake: GetName(params)
    OldMake-->>OldConsole: Return Name
    OldConsole->>User: Command Created
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.20690% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.53%. Comparing base (1fb6d9a) to head (af2cd56).

Files Patch % Lines
auth/console/policy_make_command.go 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
console/console/make_command.go 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
database/console/factory_make_command.go 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
database/console/model_make_command.go 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
database/console/observer_make_command.go 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
database/console/seeder_make_command.go 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
event/console/event_make_command.go 80.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
event/console/listener_make_command.go 83.33% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
foundation/console/test_make_command.go 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
http/console/controller_make_command.go 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
... and 6 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #597      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.11%   69.53%   -0.58%     
==========================================
  Files         182      181       -1     
  Lines       11336    11121     -215     
==========================================
- Hits         7948     7733     -215     
  Misses       2811     2811              
  Partials      577      577              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 11

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
http/console/controller_make_command.go (1)

Line range hint 48-59:
Improve error handling in Handle method.

The use of supportconsole.NewMake aligns with the optimization goals. Consider enhancing error handling by returning errors instead of printing them.

- color.Red().Println(err)
- return nil
+ return fmt.Errorf("failed to create controller: %w", err)
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1fb6d9a and a1fd8ba.

Files selected for processing (19)
  • auth/console/policy_make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • console/console/make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • database/console/factory_make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • database/console/model_make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • database/console/observer_make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • database/console/seeder_make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • event/console/event_make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • event/console/event_stubs.go (2 hunks)
  • event/console/listener_make_command.go (3 hunks)
  • foundation/console/test_make_command.go (3 hunks)
  • http/console/controller_make_command.go (5 hunks)
  • http/console/middleware_make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • http/console/request_make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • mail/console/mail_make_command.go (4 hunks)
  • queue/console/job_make_command.go (3 hunks)
  • support/console/console.go (2 hunks)
  • support/console/console_test.go (1 hunks)
  • validation/console/filter_make_command.go (3 hunks)
  • validation/console/rule_make_command.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (35)
event/console/event_stubs.go (2)

3-3: Struct Renaming Approved.

The renaming of EventStubs to Stubs simplifies the naming without affecting functionality.


20-45: Addition of Listener Method Approved.

The Listener() method provides a dummy listener definition, enhancing the stub generation capabilities.

console/console/make_command.go (2)

40-40: Refactoring of Handle Method Approved.

The use of supportconsole.NewMake centralizes command creation logic, improving encapsulation and maintainability.


60-64: Simplification of populateStub Method Approved.

The updated signature and logic simplify the stub population process.

event/console/event_make_command.go (2)

43-43: Refactoring of Handle Method Approved.

The use of supportconsole.NewMake simplifies event creation logic, enhancing clarity and maintainability.


63-64: Simplification of populateStub Method Approved.

The updated signature and logic streamline the stub population process.

foundation/console/test_make_command.go (2)

46-54: Efficient use of supportconsole.NewMake.

The refactoring to use supportconsole.NewMake simplifies the logic for creating test files by encapsulating path and name handling.


68-71: Improved parameter handling in populateStub.

The change to accept packageName and structName directly enhances clarity and simplifies the stub population process.

mail/console/mail_make_command.go (2)

47-53: Streamlined file creation with supportconsole.NewMake.

The use of supportconsole.NewMake enhances the efficiency of the mail creation command by consolidating path and name logic.


67-70: Simplified stub population in populateStub.

Directly using packageName and structName enhances the method's clarity and efficiency.

database/console/model_make_command.go (2)

47-53: Enhanced model creation with supportconsole.NewMake.

The refactoring to use supportconsole.NewMake simplifies the model creation process by integrating path and name handling.


67-70: Refined stub population in populateStub.

The direct use of packageName and structName enhances the method's clarity and reduces complexity.

http/console/middleware_make_command.go (1)

63-66: Parameter update in populateStub improves clarity.

The updated parameters packageName and structName in populateStub enhance clarity by directly using descriptive names for placeholder replacement. This change is beneficial for maintainability.

queue/console/job_make_command.go (1)

64-67: Parameter update in populateStub improves clarity.

The updated parameters packageName and structName in populateStub enhance clarity by directly using descriptive names for placeholder replacement. This change is beneficial for maintainability.

database/console/seeder_make_command.go (1)

67-70: Parameter update in populateStub improves clarity.

The updated parameters packageName and structName in populateStub enhance clarity by directly using descriptive names for placeholder replacement. This change is beneficial for maintainability.

auth/console/policy_make_command.go (1)

67-71: Enhance clarity in populateStub method.

The populateStub method efficiently replaces placeholders in the stub. Ensure that the placeholders in the stub template match the ones being replaced here.

Verification successful

Placeholders in populateStub are correctly matched.

The placeholders "DummyPolicy" and "DummyPackage" in the populateStub method are correctly matched with those in the policy stub template. No further action is required.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the placeholders in the policy stub template match those being replaced in `populateStub`.

# Test: Check for the presence of "DummyPolicy" and "DummyPackage" in the stub template.
rg --type go 'DummyPolicy|DummyPackage' --context 5

Length of output: 20194

validation/console/rule_make_command.go (1)

64-69: Enhance clarity in populateStub method.

The populateStub method efficiently replaces placeholders in the stub. Ensure that the placeholders in the stub template match the ones being replaced here.

Verification successful

Placeholders in populateStub method are correct.

The placeholders "DummyRule", "DummyName", and "DummyPackage" in the populateStub method match those in the stub template, ensuring correct replacement. No changes are needed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the placeholders in the rule stub template match those being replaced in `populateStub`.

# Test: Check for the presence of "DummyRule", "DummyName", and "DummyPackage" in the stub template.
rg --type go 'DummyRule|DummyName|DummyPackage' --context 5

Length of output: 26354

database/console/factory_make_command.go (1)

67-71: Enhance clarity in populateStub method.

The populateStub method efficiently replaces placeholders in the stub. Ensure that the placeholders in the stub template match the ones being replaced here.

Verification successful

Placeholders in populateStub method match the stub template.

The placeholders "DummyFactory" and "DummyPackage" in the populateStub method are correctly matched with those in the stub template in database/console/stubs.go. No further action is necessary.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the placeholders in the factory stub template match those being replaced in `populateStub`.

# Test: Check for the presence of "DummyFactory" and "DummyPackage" in the stub template.
rg --type go 'DummyFactory|DummyPackage' --context 5

Length of output: 19787

http/console/request_make_command.go (2)

43-49: Refactor approved: Simplified request creation.

The use of supportconsole.NewMake streamlines the logic for creating requests. Ensure that the integration of NewMake is thoroughly tested in the context of the application.


63-69: Refactor approved: Improved stub population.

The change to accept packageName and structName parameters enhances clarity in stub population. Ensure these parameters are correctly derived and used throughout the application.

support/console/console.go (2)

Line range hint 19-46:
Refactor approved: Enhanced Make initialization.

The NewMake function effectively encapsulates the initialization logic for Make, including user input handling and file existence checks. Verify that user input is handled correctly in all scenarios.


48-82: Refactor approved: Modular path and name handling.

The methods within Make encapsulate path and name manipulation effectively, promoting modularity and maintainability. Ensure these methods are correctly integrated and tested in the application.

database/console/observer_make_command.go (2)

47-53: Refactor approved: Simplified observer creation.

The integration of supportconsole.NewMake simplifies the observer creation process. Ensure that this integration is tested and functions as expected within the application.


67-71: Refactor approved: Improved stub population.

The updated populateStub method enhances clarity by using packageName and structName. Ensure these parameters are correctly derived and used in the application.

validation/console/filter_make_command.go (1)

64-66: Update populateStub method for clarity and consistency.

The updated signature now accepts packageName and structName, which simplifies the stub population process. Ensure that all placeholder replacements are consistently applied across similar commands.

event/console/listener_make_command.go (1)

64-66: Ensure consistency in populateStub method.

The changes to the populateStub method improve clarity by using packageName and structName. This approach should be consistently applied across all similar commands.

http/console/controller_make_command.go (1)

77-78: Refactor populateStub method for clarity.

The updated method signature improves clarity by directly using packageName and structName. Ensure this pattern is consistently applied across similar commands.

support/console/console_test.go (8)

17-20: Struct definition is well-organized.

The MakeTestSuite struct is appropriately defined for test organization using testify/suite.


22-24: Test suite initialization is correct.

The TestMakeTestSuite function correctly initializes and runs the test suite using suite.Run.


26-31: Setup function is correctly implemented.

The SetupTest function properly initializes the Make instance with default values for testing.


33-39: Test cases for GetFilePath are comprehensive.

The TestGetFilePath function effectively tests different scenarios for generating file paths.


41-49: Test cases for GetStructName are well-structured.

The TestGetStructName function correctly verifies the struct name derivation logic.


51-56: Test cases for GetPackageName are appropriate.

The TestGetPackageName function accurately tests the package name derivation logic.


58-63: Test cases for GetFolderPath are valid.

The TestGetFolderPath function effectively validates the folder path extraction logic.


65-132: Refactored TestNewMake is well-structured.

The TestNewMake function is refactored to use structured test cases, improving readability and maintainability. The scenarios cover both error and success cases effectively.

@hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

hwbrzzl commented Aug 13, 2024

@coderabbitai resolve

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1fd8ba and e908e2c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • support/console/console.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
support/console/console.go (6)

14-17: Struct definition is appropriate.

The Make struct encapsulates the name and root properties effectively.


Line range hint 19-46:
User prompt and error handling are well-implemented.

The NewMake function effectively handles user input and error conditions. The logic for checking file existence and prompting for a name is clear and concise.


48-52: File path construction is modular and clear.

The GetFilePath method effectively constructs a file path using the Make instance's properties. The use of helper methods enhances clarity and maintainability.


54-59: Struct name derivation is correct.

The GetStructName method accurately derives the struct name from the file name using camel case conversion.


61-71: Package name derivation is well-handled.

The GetPackageName method effectively determines the package name based on the file path. The logic for handling different path structures is sound.


73-82: Folder path construction is accurate.

The GetFolderPath method correctly constructs the folder path by excluding the file name from the path segments.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Actions performed

Comments resolved and changes approved.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Aug 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e908e2c and af2cd56.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • support/console/console.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
support/console/console.go (6)

14-17: Encapsulation of properties in Make type is appropriate.

The encapsulation of name and root within the Make type is a good design choice for organizing related functionalities.


48-52: GetFilePath method constructs paths effectively.

The method uses os.Getwd and filepath.Join to construct file paths, ensuring correct formatting with str.Camel2Case.


54-59: GetStructName method derives struct names accurately.

The method accurately trims the .go suffix and converts the last segment of the name to CamelCase.


61-71: GetPackageName method determines package names effectively.

The method effectively handles different scenarios for determining the package name, using str.Of for string manipulation.


73-82: GetFolderPath method constructs folder paths correctly.

The method correctly constructs folder paths from the name attribute using filepath.Join.


Line range hint 19-46:
NewMake function implementation is effective.

The function effectively handles user interaction for name input and checks for file existence, providing a safeguard against overwriting.

Verify that the usage of NewMake in the codebase aligns with its new signature and logic.

Verification successful

NewMake function usage is consistent across the codebase.

The function is used correctly in various modules with the expected signature and logic. It is also covered by tests, ensuring its reliability.

  • Usage locations:
    • validation/console/rule_make_command.go
    • validation/console/filter_make_command.go
    • queue/console/job_make_command.go
    • mail/console/mail_make_command.go
    • http/console/request_make_command.go
    • http/console/controller_make_command.go
    • http/console/middleware_make_command.go
    • event/console/event_make_command.go
    • foundation/console/test_make_command.go
    • database/console/model_make_command.go
    • database/console/factory_make_command.go
    • database/console/seeder_make_command.go
    • database/console/observer_make_command.go
    • auth/console/policy_make_command.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `NewMake` function in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type go -A 5 $'NewMake'

Length of output: 7981

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl merged commit 2e271fa into master Aug 14, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl deleted the bowen/optimize-make-command branch August 14, 2024 02:54
stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, "DummyName", str.Camel2Case(ruleName))
func (receiver *FilterMakeCommand) populateStub(stub string, packageName, structName string) string {
stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, "DummyFilter", structName)
stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, "DummyName", str.Camel2Case(structName))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we now support fluent strings, we can use the str.Of().Studly() method instead of Camel2Case, which can be removed from support. It's redundant here since support/console is already converting it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, structName is generated by str.Case2Camel, so it's good to call str.Camel2Case here.

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
package console

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we rename this file to only stubs(and same for other places)?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants