-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 430
Conversation
# Django Samples | ||
|
||
These two sample Django apps provide a skeleton for the two main use cases of the | ||
Django contrib helpers |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@nathanielmanistaatgoogle responded to all comments but need to take another pass myself but have to run at this minute, will finish up later tonight. Will also stop importing functions across the samples though as discussed debatable whether it makes more sense to stick with Django conventions over oauth2client conventions. |
@nathanielmanistaatgoogle ok ready for another pass, also cleaned up some unnecessary files. Following the style guide for imports does make sense to me, I think it's just the types in Whenever review is LGTM, besides needing to squash the review commits, I'd like to do a final pass on an actual server for both these samples before merge. |
Starting a new build on Jenkins! |
Build on Jenkins Started! |
Build finished. No test results found. |
Sorry experimenting with Jenkins job to report system tests in background. |
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
Django==0.10.0 |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
Django==1.10.0 | |||
oauth2client==3.0.0 |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Completed another review pass; I don't think I noticed anything beyond cosmetics. |
|
||
|
||
@decorators.oauth_required | ||
def get_profile_required(request): |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@waprin did you have the chance to take a look at the comments? |
@wasabigeek was on vacation from work and programming in general, will look back around on this tonight! |
9fee377
to
a917acf
Compare
Contains two sets of samples - one for the “Google auth” system and one for the “Django user auth” system.
a917acf
to
f91ddf8
Compare
@wasabigeek @nathanielmanistaatgoogle thanks for review comments, I addressed all the issues and tested them again, ready for review pass. Prob should wait until a release before we merge though since the samples working do depend on some of the bugfixes. |
I'm satisfied. Who else will be reviewing this? |
I think we had an oauth2client maintainer and someone who tried the samples (thanks again @wasabigeek ) so we should be good to merge. I will also at some point take a look at the google-api-python-client and see if it makes sense to redirect here which should get us more eyes. But since the samples will have known bug fixes until the next release, maybe @jonparrott wants to merge whenever next release is cut (after we update the requirements.txt)? |
@waprin the next release is cut for what? this library? What changes are needed? |
@jonparrott #623 #651 #614 . Otherwise the samples are unfortunately probably too buggy to even have in the repo. |
I'm going to merge this and cut a new release. |
Actually, I can't release without bumping a major version which we wanted to reserve for the transport refactors. @waprin where are these samples referenced? |
@jonparrott they are only referenced here for now |
@waprin then I am okay with the situation for now. Let's hold off on any external references until we can release 4.0.0. |
No description provided.