Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unsafe-libyaml: project integration #12625

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

arthurscchan
Copy link
Contributor

This PR initialises OSS-Fuzz integration for project unsafe-libyaml in Rust, adopting the existing fuzzers from upstream repository.

@arthurscchan arthurscchan marked this pull request as draft October 21, 2024 12:02
Copy link

arthurscchan is integrating a new project:
- Main repo: https://github.com/dtolnay/unsafe-libyaml.git
- Criticality score: 0.37686

@arthurscchan arthurscchan marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2024 12:14
@DavidKorczynski DavidKorczynski marked this pull request as draft October 21, 2024 14:58
@arthurscchan arthurscchan marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 19:52
@vitorguidi
Copy link
Contributor

This PR initialises OSS-Fuzz integration for project unsafe-libyaml in Rust, adopting the existing fuzzers from upstream repository.

Can you give us some pointers on how large is the user base, and what interesting attack surfaces we can help out with by fuzzing this project?

@DavidKorczynski
Copy link
Collaborator

DavidKorczynski commented Oct 29, 2024

The upstream of this is archived. We'll pause this PR for now.

@DavidKorczynski DavidKorczynski marked this pull request as draft October 29, 2024 17:59
@DavidKorczynski DavidKorczynski marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 16:14
@DavidKorczynski DavidKorczynski merged commit 90c0cbb into google:master Jan 7, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants