Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make
Object
andJsonElement
deserialization iterative #1912Make
Object
andJsonElement
deserialization iterative #1912Changes from 4 commits
539952e
e35f674
dce0d06
e1f5a59
f7d3c18
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment about switch here, and about
LinkedList
below. Is it possible to reduce the amount of code duplication between this class andObjectTypeAdapter
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code indeed looks pretty similar. Maybe this can be done by having a separate internal abstract
IterativeDeserializer
or similar with subclasses forObject
andJsonElement
deserialization, but I am not sure if this wouldn't be more complex (and possibly more inefficient). Do you have a specific implementation in mind?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's necessary to do anything about this right away, unless there is some way that people could switch between the two to circumvent any depth (etc) limitations we are trying to introduce here.