Update Swagger middleware documentation

[Amit0617]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Simplified the Swagger middleware initialization by using default configurations.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent update streamlines the integration process of the Swagger middleware by removing a parameter from the swagger.New() function. This alteration leans towards a more user-friendly approach by embracing default settings, thereby simplifying the initial setup phase for developers.

Changes

File	Change Summary
swagger/README.md	Removed a parameter in swagger.New() to use default configurations

🐇✨
In the land of code, where the rabbits hop,
A change was made, a parameter dropped.
Simplicity reigns in the middleware's song,
With defaults we dance, and to defaults, we belong.
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1dbee5 and ed1b876.

Files selected for processing (1)

• swagger/README.md (2 hunks)

Additional comments: 6

swagger/README.md (6)

• 48-54: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [6-6]

The use of multiple exclamation marks in the badges section might seem excessive. Consider simplifying to maintain professionalism in documentation.

• 48-54: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [25-25]

Add a space between sentences for better readability.

• 48-54: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [31-31]

The suggestion to replace "initialize" with other words seems to be a false positive. The usage of "initialize" is correct in this context.

• 48-54: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [41-41]

Remove the space after the opening parenthesis for consistency with Go formatting standards.

• 49-49: Add a space between sentences for better readability.
• 48-54: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [66-66]

The suggestions to remove spaces before closing parentheses are false positives in the context of Go code blocks within markdown documentation.

Also applies to: 87-87, 122-122

[gaby]

@Amit0617 Thanks! 💪