-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove differences of the code between old AnimationTree and AnimationMixer #85794
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
p_test_only does seem like dead code. The changes here suggest that it is always false. Only did a github review and not via a comprehensive test suit.
Edited:
It's a bit tricky to understand though. Do you have a test case where it fails? One of the attached issues mentioned that this fixes things by not creating empty nodes.
|
root_animation_node->_pre_process(&process_state, pi, false); | ||
started = false; | ||
} else { | ||
pi.time = p_delta; | ||
root_animation_node->_pre_process(&process_state, pi); | ||
} | ||
pi.seeked = false; | ||
pi.time = p_delta; | ||
root_animation_node->_pre_process(&process_state, pi, false); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we supposed to call pre-process (and thus process
) twice here when started
is true?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Before 4.1, it handled both the current position immediately after playback and the delta afterwards, so the purpose is to revert the behavior for now. If there is a problem, it should already be a problem with AnimationTree in 4.1, so this probably won't be a problem.
Thanks! :D |
A few lines were overlooked during those porting, sorry. I think the problem only occurred in complex use cases.
It would be helpful if someone could test on other complex trees besides the above issues.