Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix platform selection, custom tools overrides, and user overrides of use_mingw #81700

Closed

Conversation

shana
Copy link
Contributor

@shana shana commented Sep 15, 2023

TL;DR

This PR lets the platforms optionally override the default scons environment tools via a custom_tools flag, so the default SConstruct only needs to set the defaults and not worry about each individual platform requirements. The android and web toolsets that were previously hardcoded in SConstruct are moved to the respective get_flags() method in detect.py. Users can also override the tools via custom_tools.

In order to properly initialize the SCons environment with the right toolset, this adds an initial temporary SCons environment that only processes use_mingw, platform, target and custom_tools options from all the different places where they can be set. These values are parsed and then used to initialize the actual environment that we use to build, as well as determine which builder scripts to load based on the target.

This also fixes multiple related issues where, if a platform sets a default target in get_flags different from editor, and the user doesn't pass in the target in the command line, the build will be partially configured to be an editor build, setting wrong defines and source files (see "target flag" section below)

Fixes #60719

How to test this

The important bits to test are builds with a combination of use_mingw, custom tools, and default target set in the platform flags. Here is expected output for some of these configurations:

Windows host

scons
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Automatically detected platform: windows
Initializing SCons environment for "windows" with the following tools: "default".
Auto-detected 16 CPU cores available for build parallelism. Using 15 cores by default. You can override it with the -j argument.
Found MSVC version 14.3, arch x86_64
Building for platform "windows", architecture "x86_64", target "editor".

Windows host, non-mingw bash shell, use_mingw=yes

🚀  scons use_mingw=yes
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Automatically detected platform: windows
Initializing SCons environment for "windows" with the following tools: "mingw".
Auto-detected 16 CPU cores available for build parallelism. Using 15 cores by default. You can override it with the -j argument.

            Running from base MSYS2 console/environment, use target specific environment instead (e.g., mingw32, mingw64, clang32, clang64).

Windows host, mingw64 bash shell, use_mingw=yes

$ scons use_mingw=yes
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Automatically detected platform: windows
Initializing SCons environment for "windows" with the following tools: "mingw".
Auto-detected 16 CPU cores available for build parallelism. Using 15 cores by default. You can override it with the -j argument.
Using MinGW, arch x86_64
Building for platform "windows", architecture "x86_64", target "editor". 

Windows host, Android platform, use_mingw=yes

Android sets its own custom toolset for SCons, so use_mingw flag can be set, but the SCons toolset is controlled by the platform.
Android also sets a different default target, so the build output should not include any editor/ files.

scons use_mingw=yes p=android
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Initializing SCons environment for "android" with the following tools: "clang clang++ as ar link".
Auto-detected 16 CPU cores available for build parallelism. Using 15 cores by default. You can override it with the -j argument.
Checking for Android NDK...
Building for platform "android", architecture "arm64", target "template_debug".

Advanced scenario: Windows host, Windows platform, mingw64 bash shell, use_mingw=yes, custom toolset

Enabling the "msvs" SCons tool for a mingw build requires passing the full toolset list to custom_tools, so the SCons environment is correctly initialized. use_mingw needs to be passed in as well, so scripts that check it directly will do the right thing.

scons platform=windows target=template_debug use_mingw=yes custom_tools=mingw,msvs
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Initializing SCons environment for "windows" with the following tools: "mingw msvs".
Auto-detected 16 CPU cores available for build parallelism. Using 15 cores by default. You can override it with the -j argument.
Using MinGW, arch x86_64
Building for platform "windows", architecture "x86_64", target "template_debug".

Mac host

scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Automatically detected platform: macos
Initializing SCons environment for "macos" with the following tools: "default".
Auto-detected 10 CPU cores available for build parallelism. Using 9 cores by default. You can override it with the -j argument.
Building for macOS 11.0+.
MoltenVK found at: /Users/shana/VulkanSDK/1.3.261.1/MoltenVK/MoltenVK.xcframework/macos-arm64_x86_64/
Building for platform "macos", architecture "arm64", target "editor".

Mac host, iOS platform, default target set by platform

Running this build into a log file and then grepping the log file to make sure there are no editor sources included.

scons p=ios
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Initializing SCons environment for "ios" with the following tools: "default".
Auto-detected 10 CPU cores available for build parallelism. Using 9 cores by default. You can override it with the -j argument.
Building for platform "ios", architecture "arm64", target "template_debug".

Early build environment initialization issues

use_mingw

The use_mingw flag is a very special case, in that it both forces replacing the default toolset with the mingw toolset for Scons environment initialization, and is also used to determine the format of compiler flags (msvc style or gcc/clang style). This is usually not a big issue, because use_mingw is used to switch between windows+msvc and windows+mingw, so having both the toolset and the compiler check done from one option is ok.

Certain platforms (namely consoles) use a mix of windows+non-msvc compilers, so they require use_mingw to be set at all times. The problem is that use_mingw is initially only read from the command line, at the point where it's used to determine the SCons toolset to pass to the environment initialization. This means that platforms cannot set use_mingw by default in their platform flags, as these flags are ignored at this point and only read later, once the environment is already initialized with the wrong toolset.

Issue #60719 is a symptom of the way that we're currently reading use_mingw directly from the command line and ignoring any user overrides until it's too late - the flag gets set in env eventually, but by then the environment has already been created with the wrong toolset.

Another problem is that use_mingw forcebly replaces the custom tools used to initialize the environment, and not all tools enabled by the default scons toolset are enabled in the mingw toolset. Scons only initializes build tools like compilers and linkers in the mingw toolset, while the default toolset initializes a lot more tools, depending on the detected host platform. For example, the msvs tool, which enables Scons to generate visual studio projects for the current build configuration, is not enabled when using the mingw toolset. In order to allow a vs project to be generated when the mingw toolset is selected, the environment has to be initialized with ["mingw","msvs"]. This is, again, probably not a big issue for most mingw users, but since console platforms are often a mix of windows+clang+visual studio support, the way that the use_mingw flag clobbers the Scons environment toolset becomes a bit of a problem.

target flag

The target flag is being used to load editor builders (needed when building for the editor), but this particular check only looks at the flag in the command line, not the flag in the platform flags or in the environment. This means that platforms like ios, that sets a default target of template_debug, will have the editor builders loaded for non-editor builds that don't specify a target in the command line.

The env.editor_build flag is being set before reading platform flags. This means that platforms that set a different default target via get_flags() will get editor sources and defines set for non-editor builds that don't specify a target in the command line.

Contributed by W4Games

@shana shana requested review from a team as code owners September 15, 2023 16:42
@YuriSizov YuriSizov added this to the 4.2 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@shana
Copy link
Contributor Author

shana commented Sep 15, 2023

I just noticed that the Windows build GitHub Action is failing with AttributeError: 'SConsEnvironment' object has no attribute 'MSVSProject':, which is a symptom of the Environment not having the right tool set up. I can't reproduce this at all - on my git bash shell, with the exact same arguments, it builds and generates the VS project just fine. Can anyone else repro this failure?

The job is https://github.com/shana/godot/actions/runs/6200292856/job/16834775240, and it's building with scons platform=windows target=editor tests=true verbose=yes warnings=extra werror=yes module_text_server_fb_enabled=yes debug_symbols=no vsproj=yes windows_subsystem=console

Update: Nevermind, found the issue, fixing...

Update 2: Ok, it's fixed, we're good now.

@shana shana force-pushed the shana/fix-mingw-platform-tools branch from bb3b790 to 5472bdb Compare September 15, 2023 17:42
@fire
Copy link
Member

fire commented Oct 3, 2023

Can you write a brief how to test plan?

@akien-mga
Copy link
Member

Compile as you would usually, make sure it works.

@shana
Copy link
Contributor Author

shana commented Oct 5, 2023

I found an issue compiling with msys, so I'm fixing that, will update soon.

@shana shana force-pushed the shana/fix-mingw-platform-tools branch from 5472bdb to ad05813 Compare October 5, 2023 16:21
@shana shana marked this pull request as draft October 6, 2023 07:28
@shana shana force-pushed the shana/fix-mingw-platform-tools branch 5 times, most recently from 668c28b to 331d1a9 Compare October 12, 2023 13:00
@shana shana marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2023 13:03
@shana
Copy link
Contributor Author

shana commented Oct 12, 2023

Ok, let's try this again @fire @akien-mga
I've tested this on windows and mac with mingw and non-mingw builds for windows, android, mac and ios, along with other non-public platforms that introduce some edge cases to these build combos. I found more bugs with the current build initialization order that I've fixed. I've added more information to the PR body, including what to test with example outputs.

…bey overrides of use_mingw

Let the platforms optionally override the default scons environment tools
via a `custom_tools` flag, so the default SConstruct only needs to set the
defaults and not worry about each individual platform requirements.
Users can also override the tools via `custom_tools`.

Add a temporary SCons environment to only process `use_mingw`, `platform`,
`target` and `custom_tools` options from all the different places where
they can be set, and then use those values to initialize the actual
environment that we use to build, as well as determine which builder scripts
to load based on the target.

This fixes a related issue where, if a platform sets a default target
in `get_flags` different from editor, and the user doesn't pass in the
target in the command line, the `editor` target would be briefly selected
during a portion of SConstruct execution, long enough to set the
env.editor_build to true, causing editor files and defines to be set
for non-editor builds.

Fixes godotengine#60719
@shana shana force-pushed the shana/fix-mingw-platform-tools branch from 331d1a9 to 042d297 Compare October 12, 2023 13:16
@akien-mga akien-mga changed the title Fix platform selection, custom tools overrides, and user overrides of use_mingw Fix platform selection, custom tools overrides, and user overrides of use_mingw Oct 12, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@SlugFiller SlugFiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small issue. Incidentally, this is the same issue as is present in options like dev_mode. For instance, if in custom.py, dev_mode=yes verbose=no is specified, the final value of verbose will be yes, even though the explicit setting is supposed to take priority. I therefore suggest fixing both issues at the same time.

SConstruct Outdated
platform_dict = dict(platform_flags[selected_platform])
for option in opts.options:
# Use the platform flag value if it's not set in the environment already (i.e. the user hasn't overridden it).
if env_base[option.key] == option.default and option.key in platform_dict:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If a user explicitly sets an option to the default value (via command line or custom.py, and the platform flags set it to a different value, the platform flags will "take priority" in this case, because this check will think the user did not set the value.

Some different approach is needed, in which the platform flags are calculated first, and passed as the default values when building the options, for every option.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@shana shana Oct 13, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changing the default values for the options depending on the selected platform, is a design decision with slightly wider implications than what this PR is trying to accomplish, which is to fix bugs in the early option parsing.

Changing the default values means explaining to the user why the defaults are suddenly different; updating the documentation to explain why they can change; and it can potentially break existing user workflows that expect the default values to be the same regardless of the platform.

I'm not saying it's not a potentially useful change, mind you! There is some sense to deciding that the platform is the one defining the defaults, and therefore the defaults should be set by the platform, and not the other way around. So, I wouldn't mind opening a PR with a potential change to do that, and having a discussion about it, yeah.

In the meantime, for this particular issue you raised, we can handle that without changing the defaults, at least for these very early options that control the early build environment. The problem here is that we can't actually tell whether the user has set a value for an option - whatever that value is - because Scons doesn't differentiate between "value == default because the user hasn't set any value" and "value == default because the user set it to that".

There are two potential ways to fix that, for this particular part of the initialization:

  • We can use our own Variables implementation that DOES track the difference between an option that has a default implied value and an option with an explicit user value, or

  • We don't set any defaults on the options at this stage of the initialization, so if they're empty, that means the user hasn't set a value, and we can safely use the value that the platform sets. If neither user nor platform set anything, we can then use the "real" default value that we already use in the full options set later in the code. This won't affect our help text later on, because that comes from the full set of options with actual default values.

I'm going to do the second one, because that's easy and will solve our immediate issue. And it will actually put everything in place for us to talk about changing the default values on a per-platform basis in the future - it would be very easy to inject the values that are returned from the platform flags here into the full option set that we define later, if we want to do that (later, in another PR).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know what you mean by "default options per platform", and I wasn't talking about that anyway. I was talking about: If the platform sets a flag, and the user does too, the user's selection should take priority.

If you succeed in making this work using None as the default (and later override it with the real default), that's great. But, I think it might not work for options that go through conversion, e.g. boolean options, because it would try to convert None to boolean and fail. But there's only one way to find out.

If you do get it to work, note that the fix should also be applied to any use of ARGUMENTS and get_cmdline_bool below. i.e. they all need to be replaced with a check of "If the value is None, replace it with this value".

P.S. I did suggest re-implementing Variables in RocketChat, but Akien was opposed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You said

Some different approach is needed, in which the platform flags are calculated first, and passed as the default values when building the options, for every option.

This implies that the default values for the Options change depending on the selected platform. That's what I was referring to when I said it was a larger design decision than just respecting the user flags over the platform flags.

I'm not changing any usages of get_cmdline_bool or arguments right now because I'm not touching any flags that would be overridden by those direct reads, not right now anyways. This is already a complicated change due to how many things use_mingw and target affect, I don't want to add additional unrelated changes on top of it.

Once this one is good to go, we can do more fixes for other flags that aren't beyond properly obeyed. Not all of them are being handled in the same way, so they all require specific fixes.

I've pushed some fixes to properly obey the user flags over the platform flags.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The platform flags already override the default flags. There's no change there, larger or otherwise. The difference is that they currently do it for non-default flags as well.

As it is, you already copied the code that handles platform_flags from the bottom to the top, changed the top version to check the default value (and now, to check vs empty string), while leaving the bottom version as-is. That means the initial check for platform settings respects custom.py, but the actual usage does not. Meaning that, in the worst case, the settings used for building can be different than the ones used to load the tools.

Also, the empty string solution feels like a step in the wrong direction. None would have been nice if it worked, but empty string feels too fragile. It's replacing a bad hack with a worse hack.

After thinking about it for a while, there is a clean solution that doesn't require rewriting Variable. Since Python doesn't have access specifiers. As such, it's possible to retroactively change the default value of a variable by changing opts.options[i].default where opts.options[i].key is the option's name. The new default can then be applied by calling opts.Update. Notably, this can be done any number of times for the same environment. This way, several overrides for the default values can be applied, without overriding user values.

While it may seem that a complete fix to the problem is out of scope for this PR, a partial fix that is so hacky it would need to be reverted later, is better off not being merged. Even if it does need to be done in two PRs, the PR fixing the default values issue has to come first, and this one has to be based on top of it. Otherwise, a large part of this PR will simply have to be reverted later on.

shana added 2 commits October 13, 2023 17:04
Make sure that if the user sets a value equal to the default and the
platform sets a value different from the default, that the user value
is respected.
Copy link
Member

@akien-mga akien-mga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tried the PR with my usual build command on Linux, it errors out:

pyston-scons -j7 p=linuxbsd dev_build=yes dev_mode=yes linker=mold scu_build=all 2>&1 | tee -a build.log
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
KeyError: 'use_mingw':
  File "/home/akien/Projects/godot/godot.git/SConstruct", line 139:
    if env_base[option]:
  File "/home/akien/Projects/godot/toolchains/pyston_2.3.5/lib/python3.8-pyston2.3/site-packages/SCons/Environment.py", line 588:
    return self._dict[key]

env_base.disabled_modules = []
env_base.module_version_string = ""
env_base.msvc = False
# We'll parse these as strings first, so we can tell if they've been set explicitely.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo which makes the CI checks fail.

Suggested change
# We'll parse these as strings first, so we can tell if they've been set explicitely.
# We'll parse these as strings first, so we can tell if they've been set explicitly.

@YuriSizov YuriSizov modified the milestones: 4.2, 4.3 Nov 13, 2023
@adamscott adamscott self-assigned this Mar 24, 2024
@akien-mga
Copy link
Member

I need to spend more time testing this PR (after rebasing it), but please note some recent changes I've made which might partially supersede some of the changes here (but not all):

This should remove the need for some of the more workaround-y changes, at least from a quick assessment.

@KoBeWi KoBeWi modified the milestones: 4.3, 4.4 Aug 4, 2024
@shana shana closed this Nov 21, 2024
@AThousandShips AThousandShips removed this from the 4.4 milestone Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

use_mingw="yes" not Honored in custom.py
8 participants