Restore constructor/operator information in online docs #54520
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
YuriSizov
force-pushed
the
docs-ctor-operator-descriptions
branch
from
f04aa3b to
e03a949
Compare
YuriSizov
force-pushed
the
docs-ctor-operator-descriptions
branch
from
e03a949 to
51b251e
Compare
akien-mga
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2021
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Restores constructor and operator methods in the RST files after the changes in #53452. Also tries to fix the problem with operator reference ID generation mentioned in #53432.
I noticed that all constructor references are the same, but I'm not sure if using argument types is worth it for unique reference IDs there.