Fix long package version names overflowing #28619
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GiteaBot
added
the
lgtm/need 2
pull-request-size
bot
added
the
size/XS
github-actions
bot
added
the
modifies/templates
delvh
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2023
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/need 1
|
We need a hover popup at the same time. |
Does this work? |
lunny
approved these changes
Dec 30, 2023
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/done
lunny
added
the
reviewed/wait-merge
GiteaBot
removed
the
reviewed/wait-merge
zjjhot
added a commit
to zjjhot/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2024
* giteaofficial/main: Add global setting how timestamps should be rendered (go-gitea#28657) [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin Upgrade xorm to new version which supported update join for all supported databases (go-gitea#28590) Fix: system webhooks API bug (go-gitea#28531) Fix alpine package files are not rebuilt (go-gitea#28638) Fix migration test (go-gitea#28659) Avoid cycle-redirecting user/login page (go-gitea#28636) Fix long package version names overflowing (go-gitea#28619)
fuxiaohei
pushed a commit
to fuxiaohei/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2024
Fixes go-gitea#28534 --- Before:  After: <img width="304" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50193156/53d04ad0-6d5c-47e2-8a7d-30a4d5dd9959"> Should we also apply this for long filenames in Assets? It looks like this currently: <img width="285" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50193156/e2dcbb2e-30d5-4e35-b304-6274ef60bda7"> --------- Co-authored-by: Mihir <[email protected]>
silverwind
pushed a commit
to silverwind/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
Fixes go-gitea#28534 --- Before:  After: <img width="304" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50193156/53d04ad0-6d5c-47e2-8a7d-30a4d5dd9959"> Should we also apply this for long filenames in Assets? It looks like this currently: <img width="285" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50193156/e2dcbb2e-30d5-4e35-b304-6274ef60bda7"> --------- Co-authored-by: Mihir <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #28534
Before:
After:
Should we also apply this for long filenames in Assets?
It looks like this currently: