Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add request_id to ComputeFuture._metadata #1749

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

khk-globus
Copy link
Contributor

The main change is the fut._metadata dictionary update in executor.py in the happy and non-happy paths. This suggested a change in the fixtures of the tests, which resulted in a larger than expected set of test-changes. But it's all in service to the 2 _metadata hunk changes.

Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Code maintenance/cleanup

@khk-globus khk-globus added no-news-is-good-news This change does not require a news file quick-review Review of this should be quick and easy labels Dec 15, 2024
The main change is the `fut._metadata` dictionary update in `executor.py` in
the happy and non-happy paths.  This suggested a change in the fixtures of the
tests, which resulted in a larger than expected set of test-changes.  But it's
all in service to the 2 `_metadata` hunk changes.
@khk-globus khk-globus force-pushed the add_request_id_to_futures branch from 9cb97b4 to a1ce40c Compare December 15, 2024 16:53
@khk-globus khk-globus merged commit 379ee05 into main Dec 16, 2024
21 checks passed
@khk-globus khk-globus deleted the add_request_id_to_futures branch December 16, 2024 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-news-is-good-news This change does not require a news file quick-review Review of this should be quick and easy
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants