Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/ephemeral fs #4368

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Feature/ephemeral fs #4368

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

evilaliv3
Copy link
Member

With this pull request i would like to propose:

  • Replacement of SecureTemporaryFiles based on AES with EphemeralFile based on ChaCha20
  • Addition of the globaleaks-eph-fs command that we might use to instantiate an ephemeral filesystem when integrating ClamAV and MAT2

@evilaliv3 evilaliv3 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 1, 2025 19:59
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Jan 1, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.32% (target: -0.10%) 99.07% (target: 70.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (252fdf0) 19235 16046 83.42%
Head commit (b5387de) 39186 (+19951) 32815 (+16769) 83.74% (+0.32%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#4368) 431 427 99.07%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants