Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use generators instead of mapping over a set #17

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

glesica
Copy link
Owner

@glesica glesica commented Dec 6, 2018

Looking at #16 it looks like mapping over sets no longer works in the latest versions of Julia. We can switch to using generators and make the code just a touch cleaner in the process. This should work in both new and old-ish versions.

Can someone verify this for me? Thanks!

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 6, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #17 into master will increase coverage by 2.83%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #17      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   83.87%   86.7%   +2.83%     
=========================================
  Files           3       3              
  Lines         186     188       +2     
=========================================
+ Hits          156     163       +7     
+ Misses         30      25       -5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/cypherQuery.jl 82.05% <0%> (-4.44%) ⬇️
src/Neo4j.jl 88.28% <0%> (+1.8%) ⬆️
src/transaction.jl 86.84% <0%> (+13.15%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d16e360...73fa943. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants