Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ci: fast finish when build failed #1568

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2018
Merged

ci: fast finish when build failed #1568

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2018

Conversation

thinkerou
Copy link
Member

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #1568 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1568   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.06%   99.06%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines        1922     1922           
=======================================
  Hits         1904     1904           
  Misses         14       14           
  Partials        4        4

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ad53619...4b2d5f6. Read the comment docs.

@thinkerou thinkerou merged commit b02e4f2 into gin-gonic:master Sep 25, 2018
@thinkerou thinkerou deleted the fast-fail branch September 25, 2018 14:04
justinfx pushed a commit to justinfx/gin that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2018
@thinkerou @justinfx
ci: fast finish when build failed (gin-gonic#1568)
946eba9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@appleboy appleboy appleboy approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@thinkerou @appleboy