-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Show active and pending users separately (for admins) #3400
Merged
arikfr
merged 12 commits into
getredash:master
from
kravets-levko:feature/active-and-pending-users
Feb 7, 2019
Merged
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
96c9ef1
Show active and pending users separately (for admins)
kravets-levko c7493e0
Merge branch 'master' into feature/active-and-pending-users
kravets-levko c12cbba
Show sidebar both for admins and non-admins
kravets-levko 9191a5f
Refine users list API
kravets-levko 3226d54
Fix users list page: apply right policy checks
kravets-levko 49becef
Merge branch 'master' into feature/active-and-pending-users
kravets-levko 055c3b7
Tests
kravets-levko 1b30408
Fix code style
kravets-levko 5e93402
List pages: debounce search
kravets-levko b6397dc
Refine tests
kravets-levko 42bdb97
Refine tests
kravets-levko 8518daf
Merge branch 'master' into feature/active-and-pending-users
kravets-levko File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure why you care about unexpected ids. If you work with a set, you test complete, unordered equality. No need for intersection stuff as well.
You can just get rid of
assertUsersListMatches
and assert for set equality in the tests. i.e:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll try to explain. I'm creating all possible combinations of users for my tests. But there may be other users in DB that will match particular conditions. So for example I create users 1,2,3 and do some request. Users 1,2 will match filter, user 3 not. But it's possible that pre-existed users will also be there, and, say, they'll also match filter, so result will be 1,2,8 instead of 1,2. If I'll compare for equality, test will fail. Therefore I check exactly what I have to check: which of users I expect to see in output and which shouldn't be there for sure.