-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
readOnly validation causing backwards incompatibility #689
Comments
Sure! Send away :) |
It's someone working right now on this? @simonjpartridge I can take this if you are not actively working on it. |
orshlom
added a commit
to orshlom/kin-openapi
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2023
orshlom
added a commit
to orshlom/kin-openapi
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2023
Hey @fenollp, please review the PR when you got the time 😏 I have made |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The addition of validation for readOnly #599 has caused issues for our existing clients when calling our API.
Especially in the flow where a user does a put update, they end up incidentally sending readOnly parameters to the API.
Ideally I think the readOnly validation should be optional with a configuration option.
Would you be open to this change if we were to raise a PR to implement it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: