Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed typos, language, and clarified interior/exterior rule #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2013

Conversation

mpdaly
Copy link
Contributor

@mpdaly mpdaly commented May 15, 2013

Interior rings must fall within the geometry of the exterior ring, not just the convex hull of the exterior ring.

Interior rings must fall within the geometry of the exterior ring, not just the convex hull of the exterior ring.
@sthagen sthagen merged commit 424a06e into geojson:master May 15, 2013
@sgillies
Copy link
Contributor

@sdrees Hold on, let's have a little more discussion before we merge these. I didn't merge my own (#1) directly because I was looking for more comment first.

On this particular issue, I remember that we had consensus (back in the day) to keep issues of geometric validity out of the spec. Can we just explain what validity means without requiring geometries to be valid?

@tschaub
Copy link
Member

tschaub commented May 15, 2013

Agreed. This makes it impossible to have a service that validates geometry and use GeoJSON as the transport.

@mpdaly
Copy link
Contributor Author

mpdaly commented May 15, 2013

Fine by me to remove all the geometry validity language; not fine for it to be there and be wrong.

Martin

This was referenced May 15, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants