Create new rule to prevent propagation of certain terms by orthology/similarity

[pgaudet]

From @pgaudet on November 23, 2017 12:23

Hello,

Following up on #13004, we need to implement a rule to prevent propagation of GO:0001618 virus receptor activity annotations.

It may make sense to also include other terms - to be discussed with the Virus team at Swiss-Prot.

Copied from original issue: geneontology/go-ontology#14641

[pgaudet]

Only allow EXP (ECO:0000006) and subclasses in ECO (to confirm with Virus Swiss-Prot group)

[cmungall]

OK, as discussed on the call, @dougli1sqrd will start with a check that highlights any association to GO:0001618 that has evidence other than subClassOf* of ECO:0000006

[ValWood]

Other terms which maybe should not be propagated
"response to....." (at least high level ones)
from geneontology/go-annotation#1344

[pgaudet]

Current mechanisms (taxon constraints and do-not annotate) are covering this usecase.