-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
changelog: Use terminology from README #250
changelog: Use terminology from README #250
Conversation
b45101a
to
addfd97
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there were a few renames that should be reverted. Otherwise, LGTM!
I pushed my fast-forward commit, and GitHub lost your review lines in the "Files Changed" view :( |
Addressed changes. PTAL. Will squash once this is approved (and make the DCO thing happy). |
5e1b29d
to
d8d0be8
Compare
looks good, but I found a few more potential name fixes in scpeters@5896855 |
Will incorporate the changes shortly! |
Signed-off-by: Eric Cousineau <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Steven Peters <[email protected]>
d8d0be8
to
3866d69
Compare
Done. Squashed into 3866d69 |
Signed-off-by: Eric Cousineau <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Steven Peters <[email protected]>
When writing a response in RobotLocomotion/drake#13105, I realized that this terminology should be put in sync with what's defined for this repo's current README.
I dunno if I should change the PR titles themselves, but I do think there should a practice of explicitly disambiguating spec (SDFormat) vs. implementation (libsdformat), especially when it comes to describing version numbers (where both diverge heavily).
FYI @scpeters