-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changed calculation for range clipping #325
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e9a3dc2
changed calculation for depht
Lobotuerk 9bfe9d1
Ian comments
Lobotuerk 1344138
Merge branch 'main' into lobotuerk/depthRangeChange
iche033 272c20c
Merge branch 'main' into lobotuerk/depthRangeChange
Lobotuerk 87267f8
test fix
Lobotuerk 7981084
fix test
Lobotuerk b68668f
Merge branch 'main' into lobotuerk/depthRangeChange
Lobotuerk 34267e4
updated tests and migration
Lobotuerk 9675ef6
tweak to migration guide
iche033 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you make the same change to
depth_camera_final_fs.glsl
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I change this, the tests start falling again. expecting -inf and getting inf https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-rendering/blob/lobotuerk/depthRangeChange/test/integration/depth_camera.cc#L324-L326
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing both that and https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-rendering/blob/lobotuerk/depthRangeChange/test/integration/depth_camera.cc#L309-L311 to
maxVal
make all tests pass, but I don't think that makes senseThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the problem is that because
point
was previously clamped to-inf
solength(point)
becomes+inf
. So indepth_camera_final_fs.glsl
we can change to something like:which just skips this additional clamping if it's already been clamped in the previous pass.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
34267e4 should take care of this