Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: Fix self-hosted GHA runners in GKE MGX-868 #669

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 3, 2024

Conversation

tenequm
Copy link
Contributor

@tenequm tenequm commented Jan 2, 2024

@tenequm tenequm self-assigned this Jan 2, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f7256fe) 51.32% compared to head (c4d3680) 51.32%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #669   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    51.32%   51.32%           
========================================
  Files           39       39           
  Lines         6963     6963           
========================================
  Hits          3574     3574           
  Misses        3389     3389           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tenequm tenequm changed the title CI: Fix self-hosted GHA runners in GKE CI: Fix self-hosted GHA runners in GKE MGX-868 Jan 2, 2024
@tenequm tenequm marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2024 16:44
@tenequm tenequm requested review from mateuszaaa and goncer January 2, 2024 20:32
@tenequm tenequm merged commit 8f9652b into develop Jan 3, 2024
55 checks passed
@tenequm tenequm deleted the ci/fix-gha-gke-runners branch January 3, 2024 09:39
tenequm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
tenequm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants