Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix installation of gosec and addlicense #957

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

thiyyakat
Copy link
Contributor

@thiyyakat thiyyakat commented Dec 2, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR fixes the inconsistent variable name used in tools.mk for the installation of addlicense which was preventing add-license-header make target from succeeding. Additionally, it also changes the way in which gosec installation is defined in tools.mk such that mcm-providers can leverage it in a consistent manner.

The PR also updates the go lang version to v1.23.3

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Fixed `addlicense` and  `gosec` installation.
Updated go lang to version `1.23.3`

@thiyyakat thiyyakat requested a review from a team as a code owner December 2, 2024 05:51
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) and removed size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rishabh-11 rishabh-11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 2, 2024
@rishabh-11 rishabh-11 merged commit f733669 into gardener:master Dec 2, 2024
3 of 5 checks passed
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Dec 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 2, 2024
thiyyakat added a commit to thiyyakat/machine-controller-manager that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
* Change values and names of variables used in tools.mk file to fix bug in gosec and addlicense installation

* run make generate

* Update go version to v1.23.3

---------

Co-authored-by: Rishabh Patel <[email protected]>
rishabh-11 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
* Change values and names of variables used in tools.mk file to fix bug in gosec and addlicense installation

* run make generate

* Update go version to v1.23.3

---------

Co-authored-by: Rishabh Patel <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants