Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add MRSA Nanopore assembly tutorial to AMR learning pathway
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
bebatut committed Feb 29, 2024
1 parent f343dd9 commit 1213927
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 5 changed files with 784 additions and 888 deletions.
6 changes: 2 additions & 4 deletions learning-pathways/amr-gene-detection.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -32,10 +32,8 @@ pathway:
tutorials:
- name: mrsa-illumina
topic: assembly
# - name: mrsa-nanopore
# topic: assembly
# - name: hybrid-assembly
# topic: assembly
- name: mrsa-nanopore
topic: assembly

- section: "Module: Genome annotation"
description: |
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions topics/assembly/tutorials/mrsa-nanopore/tutorial.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
layout: tutorial_hands_on

title: Genome Assembly of MRSA using Oxford Nanopore MinION (and Illumina data if available)
title: Genome Assembly of MRSA from Oxford Nanopore MinION data (and optionally Illumina data)
zenodo_link: 'https://zenodo.org/record/10669812'
questions:
- How to check the quality of the MinION data (together with Illumina data)?
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ For each run, **NanoPlot** generates 5 outputs:
> > <solution-title></solution-title>
> > 1. 3,400 bp to 5,451 bp, a 60.3% increase
> > 2. A -2.0% decrease is not a very significant decrease. Our data was quite good to start with and didn't have many short reads which were removed (23.4%)
> > 3. The coverage is a measure of how many reads 'cover' on average a single base in the genome. If you divide the total reads by the genome size, you will get a number how many times your genomes could theoretically be covered by reads.
> > 3. The coverage is a measure of how many reads 'cover' on average a single base in the genome. If you divide the total reads by the genome size, you will get a number how many times your genomes could theoretically be "covered" by reads.
> > 4. Before $$ \frac{621,945,741}{2,900,000} = 214.4$$ and after $$ \frac{609,657,642}{2,900,000} = 210.2$$. This is *not* a very big decrease in coverage, so no cause for concern. Generally in sequencing experiments you have some minimum coverage you expect to see based on how much of your sample you sequenced. If it falls below that threshold it might be cause for concern.
> >
> {: .solution}
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
- doc: Test outline for Genome-Assembly-of-MRSA-using-Oxford-Nanopore-MinION-(and-Illumina-data-if-available)
job:
Illumina reverse raw reads:
class: File
path: test-data/Illumina reverse raw reads.fastqsanger.bz2
filetype: fastqsanger.bz2
Illumina forward raw reads:
class: File
path: test-data/Illumina forward raw reads.fastqsanger.bz2
filetype: fastqsanger.bz2
Nanopore raw reads:
class: File
path: test-data/Nanopore raw reads.fastqsanger.bz2
filetype: fastqsanger.bz2
outputs:
quast_report_after_polishing:
path: test-data/quast_report_after_polishing.html
quast_report_before_polishing:
path: test-data/quast_report_before_polishing.html
nanoplot_after_filtering:
path: test-data/nanoplot_after_filtering.tabular
flye_assembly_info:
path: test-data/flye_assembly_info.tabular
nanoplot_before_filtering:
path: test-data/nanoplot_before_filtering.tabular
Loading

0 comments on commit 1213927

Please sign in to comment.