[Workaround] Docker-in-Docker for mulled containers #58
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
almahmoud
changed the title
|
This is a far more compact solution than I expected. Useful to have this PR around for future reference. Also linking in this new PR that will allow us to identify the broken containers and fix them at the source: galaxyproject/galaxy#8741 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is not necessarily meant to be merged, but a useful workaround until we figure out how to automate the process of finding combinations of tools not in biocontainers.
Having a docker-in-docker container will allow the job containers to build mulled containers on-the-fly and use them when the images are not found in biocontainers.