Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for #237: record actual Type for ParameterType if implicit type is available #244

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2020

Conversation

vlsergey
Copy link
Contributor

Fix for #237 with test cases

@vlsergey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Personally i believe that "recorded" shall not be populated during validation stage, only when ref to type / function is instantiated. But such "prefill" patch also works.

@vlsergey vlsergey changed the title Fix for #237 with test cases Fix for #237: enforce record of ParameterType if implicit type is available Jun 27, 2020
@vlsergey vlsergey changed the title Fix for #237: enforce record of ParameterType if implicit type is available Fix for #237: record actual Type for ParameterType if implicit type is available Jun 27, 2020
@gajus gajus merged commit 1fe51ee into gajus:master Jul 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants