Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix UTA readme formatting and wording #249

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jsstevenson
Copy link
Contributor

Noticed a few minor issues in the UTA setup instructions, most notably that some newline chars were getting added into a command where a literal newline was probably intended.

@jsstevenson jsstevenson added documentation Changes to documentation only priority:low Low priority labels Sep 7, 2023
@jsstevenson jsstevenson requested review from a team as code owners September 7, 2023 19:24
Copy link
Contributor

@korikuzma korikuzma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would we actually be able to move this to biocommons.uta repo? I made an issue for it a while back ago

@jsstevenson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Might be a good idea? FWIW, these instructions make several assumptions about things like the OS and how PostgreSQL is installed, which we might want to resolve if we are adding it to the main repo

@korikuzma
Copy link
Contributor

Might be a good idea? FWIW, these instructions make several assumptions about things like the OS and how PostgreSQL is installed, which we might want to resolve if we are adding it to the main repo

Right so including + referencing this

@jsstevenson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Going to close this in favor of a more expansive reorganization of docs in #272

@jsstevenson jsstevenson deleted the uta-readme branch January 8, 2024 20:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Changes to documentation only priority:low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants