Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jupyter Notebooks in the Cloud #93

Closed
1 task done
korikuzma opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #99
Closed
1 task done

Jupyter Notebooks in the Cloud #93

korikuzma opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #99
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@korikuzma
Copy link
Contributor

korikuzma commented Apr 20, 2022

Allow users to run the jupyter notebooks without having to clone the repo and install SeqRepo + UTA. @ahwagner suggests using Binder. This will allow users to easily play around with vrs-python's functionality.

Prerequisites:

@korikuzma
Copy link
Contributor Author

Update for SeqRepo Rest API:
- Public API
- GitHub Repo

@reece
Copy link
Member

reece commented May 17, 2022

Is there a reason you don't want to use the default RDS public instance? It's plenty fast and Invitae's paying for it!

@korikuzma
Copy link
Contributor Author

@reece mybinder only allows these ports outbound

@ahwagner
Copy link
Member

My understanding of what we are trying to do re: UTA is to build an API that can retrieve data from a UTA instance over HTTP(S), as direct connections over the postgresql default port are commonly firewalled (true here at NCH, as well as at mybinder.org as @korikuzma pointed out).

I think the intention here is to create such an API hosted by NCH, which points to an internal RDS instance (currently necessary due to NCH firewall restrictions). I agree it would be great if we could leverage the Invitae RDS for this purpose, especially once issues around versioned Ensembl transcripts and update frequency are addressed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants