Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2023. It is now read-only.

Community level Beacon identifier's assignment #55

Closed
sduvaud opened this issue May 31, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Community level Beacon identifier's assignment #55

sduvaud opened this issue May 31, 2016 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@sduvaud
Copy link

sduvaud commented May 31, 2016

Currently, the Beacon identifier is just an ID, assigned by the developer of the Beacon.
Of course, it is everybody’s best interest to use a unique ID, and in the worth case it shouldn’t be a problem if the ID is not unique. Anyway, it may be a good practise to set up a kind of central authority to assign Beacon unique identifiers.

@mcupak mcupak added this to the 1.0 milestone May 31, 2016
@jrambla
Copy link
Collaborator

jrambla commented Jun 15, 2016

Couldn't we use the reversed namespace approach? i.e. org.ega-archive.beacon

@mcupak
Copy link
Contributor

mcupak commented Jun 28, 2016

+1, the reverse domain approach sounds like a good idea.

@mcupak mcupak removed the proposal label Jun 28, 2016
@antbro
Copy link

antbro commented Jun 28, 2016

+1

Tony


From: Miro Cupak [[email protected]]
Sent: 28 June 2016 15:54
To: ga4gh/beacon-team
Subject: Re: [ga4gh/beacon-team] Community level Beacon identifier's assignment (#55)

+1, the reverse domain approach sounds like a good idea.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/55#issuecomment-229074393, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AI_EVOYNsXBe8Mdkgk47TCN3wU5HSyg4ks5qQTWUgaJpZM4IqlgI.

@mcupak mcupak modified the milestones: 0.4, 1.x Jul 12, 2016
@sdelatorrep
Copy link
Contributor

+1

sdelatorrep added a commit to sdelatorrep/beacon-team that referenced this issue May 2, 2017
@antbro antbro mentioned this issue May 2, 2017
Merged
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants