-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add option to DemuxFastqs to filter on the internal control flag in the header comment #714
Conversation
@@ -293,9 +293,13 @@ object DemuxFastqs { | |||
| | |||
|`--fastq-skip-read-numbers=true --fastq-include-sample-barcodes=true --illumina-file-names=true` | |||
| | |||
|To output reads with a passing filter flag, use: | |||
|To output reads with a passing filter flag, as encoded in the <is filtered> field in the header comment, use: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding backticks, since the usage is parsed as markdown, which is really nice.
|To output reads with a passing filter flag, as encoded in the <is filtered> field in the header comment, use: | |
|To output reads with a passing filter flag, as encoded in the `<is filtered>` field in the header comment, use: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, I think you're mixing up PRs, as I think I asked for this in the other PR: #713 (comment)
a3620e0
to
df29da6
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #714 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.39% 95.39%
=======================================
Files 114 114
Lines 6601 6606 +5
Branches 457 440 -17
=======================================
+ Hits 6297 6302 +5
Misses 304 304
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
c697230
to
1a8288f
Compare
b49f7f6
to
4199efd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor changes left!
fastqStandards = this.fastqStandards, | ||
skipFailingReads = this.skipFailingReads | ||
skipFailingReads = this.skipFailingReads, | ||
omitControlReads = this.omitControlReads |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
align equals
sources = sources, | ||
demultiplexer = demultiplexer, | ||
threads = threads, | ||
skipFailingReads = this.skipFailingReads, | ||
omitControlReads = this.omitControlReads | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sources = sources, | |
demultiplexer = demultiplexer, | |
threads = threads, | |
skipFailingReads = this.skipFailingReads, | |
omitControlReads = this.omitControlReads | |
) | |
sources = sources, | |
demultiplexer = demultiplexer, | |
threads = threads, | |
skipFailingReads = this.skipFailingReads, | |
omitControlReads = this.omitControlReads | |
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work! LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My only concern is that I feel like we should pick one of skip
or omit
and use it in both options rather than mix and match.
b2c5f42
to
42f6aa4
Compare
71421bc
to
8b797c7
Compare
8b797c7
to
ca6afe0
Compare
No description provided.