Garde #259
Garde #259
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update focuses on enhancing form validation and template handling across the codebase. Dependencies like Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Controller
participant Validator
participant Renderer
User ->> Controller: Submit Form
Controller ->> Validator: Validate Form Data
Validator -->> Controller: Validation Result
Controller ->> Renderer: Render Response
Renderer -->> User: Display Result
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/controller/mod.rs (1)
457-488: The use ofgardefor validation inSiteConfigis well-implemented. However, consider adding comments to explain why certain fields likecaptcha_difficultyandcaptcha_nameare skipped from validation. This will help maintain clarity and ensure future maintainers understand the validation strategy.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (14)
- Cargo.toml (3 hunks)
- src/controller/admin.rs (3 hunks)
- src/controller/feed.rs (4 hunks)
- src/controller/inn.rs (8 hunks)
- src/controller/message.rs (2 hunks)
- src/controller/meta_handler.rs (2 hunks)
- src/controller/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- src/controller/notification.rs (1 hunks)
- src/controller/solo.rs (3 hunks)
- src/controller/tantivy.rs (2 hunks)
- src/controller/upload.rs (1 hunks)
- src/controller/user.rs (9 hunks)
- src/error.rs (1 hunks)
- src/main.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- src/controller/meta_handler.rs
- src/controller/notification.rs
- src/controller/tantivy.rs
- src/controller/upload.rs
Additional comments not posted (25)
src/error.rs (1)
49-49: The addition ofValidationErrorusinggarde::Erroraligns with the migration fromvalidatortogarde. Ensure that all parts of the application that handle validation errors are updated to handle this new error type.Cargo.toml (1)
10-10: The updates and additions to the dependencies are consistent with the PR's objectives. Ensure to verify the compatibility of these new versions with the existing codebase and check for any potential conflicts or deprecated features.Also applies to: 13-14, 17-17, 22-22, 36-37, 53-53
src/main.rs (1)
17-17: The update to usetikv_jemallocator::Jemallocfor the global allocator is a good improvement for memory management. Recommend thorough testing to ensure there are no performance regressions or issues in different deployment environments.src/controller/message.rs (1)
1-1: The update to useaskama_axumfromaskamafor template handling aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance integration withaxum. Ensure that all templates are correctly migrated and tested with the new library to prevent runtime issues.Also applies to: 14-14
src/controller/mod.rs (1)
392-402: The use ofgarde::skipfor fields likeiid,is_draft, anddelete_draftinFormPostis appropriate as these fields likely do not need validation. However, ensure that skipping validation on these fields does not introduce any security or logical issues, especially in contexts where these fields are critical.src/controller/admin.rs (4)
5-5: The update to usePageDataandParamsPagefrommeta_handlerwithout the previously used imports reflects a cleaner and more focused import strategy. This change should help reduce namespace clutter and potential conflicts.
14-18: Switching toaskama_axumfor template handling aligns with the broader refactoring to useaxumframeworks more extensively. Ensure that theinto_responsefunction is adequately tested withaskama_axumto handle edge cases in template rendering.
21-21: The introduction ofWithValidationfromaxum_gardeis a significant change. It's crucial to ensure that all forms now usingWithValidationare correctly handling the new validation logic, especially in error handling scenarios.Verification successful
The search results indicate that error handling is present in the files where
WithValidationis used. The error handling logic involves various custom errors likeAppError::NonLogin,AppError::Unauthorized, and others, which suggests that validation errors are being managed appropriately.
src/controller/admin.rssrc/controller/inn.rssrc/controller/solo.rssrc/controller/user.rsThese files contain instances of
WithValidationand have corresponding error handling logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all forms using `WithValidation` handle validation errors correctly. # Test: Search for error handling logic related to `WithValidation`. rg --type rust $'WithValidation.*Err'Length of output: 38
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify all instances where `WithValidation` is used and inspect their error handling. # Step 1: Find all instances of `WithValidation`. rg --type rust 'WithValidation' > with_validation_instances.txt # Step 2: Check for error handling logic in files containing `WithValidation`. while IFS= read -r file; do echo "Checking error handling in $file" rg --type rust 'Err' "$file" done < <(cut -d: -f1 with_validation_instances.txt | sort | uniq)Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify all instances where `WithValidation` is used and inspect their error handling. # Step 1: Find all instances of `WithValidation`. rg --type rust 'WithValidation' > with_validation_instances.txt # Step 2: Check for error handling logic in files containing `WithValidation`. for file in $(cut -d: -f1 with_validation_instances.txt | sort | uniq); do echo "Checking error handling in $file" rg --type rust 'Err' "$file" doneLength of output: 12555
348-356: The methodadmin_postnow usesWithValidationfor form handling, which is a good use of the new validation framework. However, ensure that the custom regex validation and HTML cleaning logic are robust against all forms of input, especially in terms of security considerations like XSS and injection attacks.src/controller/solo.rs (1)
15-15: Updated imports to useaskama_axumandaxum_gardeare correctly aligned with the PR objectives.Also applies to: 25-25, 27-27
src/controller/feed.rs (1)
17-17: Updated imports to useaskama_axumandgarde::Validateare correctly aligned with the PR objectives.Also applies to: 29-29
src/controller/user.rs (9)
16-16: Updated imports and validation handling align with the PR's objectives.Also applies to: 23-23, 28-28
730-730: TheWithValidationwrapper is used for form data inuser_setting_post. This is a good use of the new validation framework. Ensure that all fields are appropriately validated before they are processed.
771-775: InFormPassword, theold_passwordfield is correctly marked to skip validation, which is appropriate since it's used for verification only. Thepasswordandpassword2fields are set to match and have a minimum length, which enhances security.
782-782: TheWithValidationwrapper is used inuser_password_postto ensure that the password change request is properly validated. This is a crucial security feature.
865-871: TheFormSignupstruct usesgarde::Validatefor validation. Theusernameandpasswordfields are correctly annotated to ensure they meet the specified constraints. Thepassword2field is set to match thepasswordfield, which is a good practice for user registration forms.
923-923: TheWithValidationwrapper is used insignup_postto ensure that the signup form data is properly validated. This is essential for maintaining data integrity and security during user registration.
1006-1006: TheFormRecoverySetstruct and its usage inuser_recovery_codeare correctly set up to handle password recovery securely. The password field is validated for minimum length, which is crucial for security.Also applies to: 1013-1013
585-591: TheFormUserstruct has been updated to usegarde::Validatefor field validation. Ensure that thehome_pagefield, which is marked to skip validation, is handled appropriately in the logic to prevent any unintended side effects.
672-678: TheFormResetstruct usesgarde::Validatefor validation. Thepasswordandpassword2fields are correctly annotated to ensure they match and meet minimum length requirements. However, ensure that thematchesdirective is correctly implemented in thegardecrate as it is a critical security feature.src/controller/inn.rs (5)
23-23: Updated import statements to useaskama_axumandaxum_gardeinstead ofaskamaandvalidator. This aligns with the project-wide changes to use these libraries for template rendering and form validation.Also applies to: 30-30, 41-41, 45-45
125-137: RefactoredFormInnstruct to usegarde::Validateannotations. The use of#[garde(skip)]on certain fields likeinn_type,early_birds, andlimit_edit_secondsis appropriate, as these fields likely do not require validation based on their nature or context.
1765-1765: TheFormCommentstruct andcomment_postfunction have been updated to usegarde::Validatefor validation. This is a good use of the new validation library to ensure data integrity.Also applies to: 1773-1773
1915-1915: Thepreviewfunction now usesWithValidationfor handling input validation. This is a good practice to ensure that the content being previewed adheres to the defined constraints.
147-147: The change fromValidatedFormtoWithValidationin the function signature formod_inn_postis consistent with the new validation approach usingaxum_garde. Ensure that all upstream calls to this function are updated to handle the new form validation wrapper.
| #[garde(length(min = 1, max = 1000))] | ||
| content: String, | ||
| #[garde(skip)] | ||
| solo_type: u32, | ||
| #[garde(skip)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Skipping validation for solo_type and reply_to is not safe due to their critical roles in determining access, behavior, and linking entities. Ensure these fields are validated or inherently safe.
solo_typeis used in conditional checks and conversions, impacting access and behavior.reply_tois used for parsing and formatting, linking or referencing other entities.
Analysis chain
The use of garde::Validate and garde attributes for validation is consistent with the PR's refactoring goals. However, ensure that skipping validation for solo_type and reply_to is intentional and secure, as it might expose the application to invalid data processing if these fields are critical.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if skipping validation for `solo_type` and `reply_to` is safe.
# Test: Search for usage of `solo_type` and `reply_to` in the codebase. Expect: Proper handling or non-critical usage.
rg --type rust $'solo_type|reply_to'
Length of output: 3892
| @@ -377,7 +381,7 @@ fn get_solos_by_uids( | |||
| /// `POST /solo/user/:uid` solo page | |||
| pub(crate) async fn solo_post( | |||
| cookie: Option<TypedHeader<Cookie>>, | |||
| ValidatedForm(input): ValidatedForm<FormSolo>, | |||
| WithValidation(input): WithValidation<Form<FormSolo>>, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The search results indicate that there are no direct test cases involving WithValidation in the repository. This suggests that the new form handling logic might not be thoroughly tested, especially for edge cases where the form might be invalid.
- Ensure that the new form handling logic using
WithValidationis thoroughly tested. - Add test cases that specifically cover edge cases and invalid form submissions.
Analysis chain
The transition to WithValidation for form handling is well implemented. The use of input.into_inner() to extract validated data is a good practice. Ensure that the new form handling logic is thoroughly tested, especially for edge cases where the form might be invalid.
Also applies to: 403-403
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify comprehensive testing of form handling.
# Test: Search for test cases involving `WithValidation`. Expect: Adequate test coverage.
rg --type rust $'WithValidation' -A 10 | rg 'test'
Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Step 1: Find all test files in the repository
fd --type f --name '*test*.rs'
# Step 2: Search for test cases that might involve form validation
rg --type rust 'test' -A 10 | rg 'form|validation|WithValidation'
Length of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Step 1: Find all test files in the repository using the correct fd syntax
fd --type f 'test'
# Step 2: Search for test cases that might involve form validation
rg --type rust 'test' -A 10 | rg 'form|validation|WithValidation'
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Step 1: Find all test functions in the repository
rg --type rust 'fn test_' -A 10
# Step 2: Search for references to `WithValidation` within these test functions
rg --type rust 'WithValidation'
Length of output: 2063
| #[garde(length(max = 256))] | ||
| url: String, | ||
| #[validate(length(max = 256))] | ||
| #[garde(length(max = 256))] | ||
| folder: String, | ||
| #[validate(length(max = 256))] | ||
| #[garde(length(max = 256))] | ||
| new_folder: String, | ||
| #[garde(skip)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The is_public field is used in various parts of the codebase, including critical sections where it determines access control and visibility of feeds. Given its importance, skipping validation for this field could indeed pose a security risk if not handled properly elsewhere.
- Locations to review:
src/controller/feed.rs: Multiple instances whereis_publicis used to control access and visibility.src/controller/admin.rs: Usage in administrative functions.
Given the critical nature of is_public, it is essential to ensure that its value is correctly set and validated to prevent unauthorized access or visibility issues.
Analysis chain
The use of garde::Validate for form validation in FormFeedAdd is consistent with the PR's refactoring goals. However, ensure that the is_public field's validation is intentionally skipped. This could be a security concern if the field is critical and expects specific values.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if skipping validation for `is_public` is safe.
# Test: Search for usage of `is_public` in the codebase. Expect: Proper handling or non-critical usage.
rg --type rust $'is_public'
Length of output: 838
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather more context around the usage of `is_public` in the codebase.
# Test: Extract lines around the usage of `is_public` to understand its context.
rg --type rust -A 5 -B 5 'is_public'
Length of output: 5166
Summary by CodeRabbit
Dependencies
askama_axum,axum-extra,cached,reqwest,ring,webpki-roots.axum_garde,garde.New Features
gardefor form validation, replacingvalidator.Refactor
askama::Templatewithaskama_axum::Templateacross multiple controllers.ValidatedFormtoWithValidation.Bug Fixes
Chores
Cargo.tomlto reflect new and updated dependencies.