Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

optee: resolve include clash with meta-arm #581

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2022

Conversation

jbrun3t
Copy link
Contributor

@jbrun3t jbrun3t commented Mar 30, 2022

meta-arm already provides optee. Some BSP rely on this version of optee
rather than the one provided by lmp. Include files, such as
optee-client.inc, clash with meta-arm which the bb recipe from meta-arm use
the include from meta-lmp.

Append "-fio" to includes provided by meta-lmp so they don't clash with
meta-arm.

meta-arm already provides optee. Some BSP rely on this version of optee
rather than the one provided by lmp. Include files, such as
optee-client.inc, clash with meta-arm which the bb recipe from meta-arm use
the include from meta-lmp.

Append "-fio" to includes provided by meta-lmp so they don't clash with
meta-arm.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@ricardosalveti ricardosalveti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@ricardosalveti ricardosalveti merged commit 1d369a4 into foundriesio:main Mar 30, 2022
@jbrun3t
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbrun3t commented Mar 30, 2022

Thx, Can you put this on the honister support branch too please ?

@jbrun3t jbrun3t deleted the optee-clash branch March 30, 2022 20:11
@ricardosalveti
Copy link
Member

Thx, Can you put this on the honister support branch too please ?

Honister is now in sync with master, which includes your change. Manifest is not yet updated to reflect the latest meta-lmp but we should be doing that later today (just landing a few other minor fixes first).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants