Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add optee-os-fio 3.20 fork for imx #1093

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 4, 2023

Conversation

ricardosalveti
Copy link
Member

Based on the NXP BSP tree (with our additional fixes on top).

This fork will be initially used by 7ulp/8ulp and imx93, until most
relevant changes are proposed and merged upstream (ELE, provisioning
TAs, cpufreq, suspend, etc).

This allow additional optee-os based recipes to be provided by bsp
layers, since the require lines are also based on the PV used.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <[email protected]>
Prefer reusing PV from the recipe base version (based on the file name)
in order to allow easy inclusion from other recipes (e.g. optee forks).

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <[email protected]>
Make the optee-os related bbappends less specific to the exact version
in order to allow forks from BSP layers (based on the same 3.20 base
version).

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <[email protected]>
Based on the NXP BSP tree (with our additional fixes on top).

This fork will be initially used by 7ulp/8ulp and imx93, until most
relevant changes are proposed and merged upstream (ELE, provisioning
TAs, cpufreq, suspend, etc).

DEFAULT_PREFERENCE set to -1 as we still prefer our main fio fork when
possible.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <[email protected]>
@ricardosalveti ricardosalveti requested review from vanmaegima and a team April 4, 2023 00:12
Copy link
Member

@quaresmajose quaresmajose left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ricardosalveti ricardosalveti merged commit f01c998 into foundriesio:main Apr 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants