Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would change it to
So that the error is shown to a user instead of appending to
otp_displ
variable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have tested your proposal: it works with
bash
anddash
. But I am not so sure it is want we want.The purpose of the
otp_displ=$(...)
assignment is, in my view, to retrieve the information once, so that we can parse it and know the OTP state. In my view, a closed STM32MP15x with an unreadable OTP is something perfectly normal and supported. So I wanted something that just negates the code1
returned bySTM32_Programmer_CLI
. I could have written something as|| /usr/bin/true
, but I think we could be more explicit with a sort of comment that would be written in the$otp_displ
content. Those who inspect it will know more about the OTP state.My intention was not to issue a warning, nothing is malfunctioning.
Your proposal will generate a visible warning when the STM32MP15x is closed. My code consider a closed STM32MP15x as a feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, it looks reasonable.