Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: (temporal) add initial delay when being rate-limited by PSP #236
feat: (temporal) add initial delay when being rate-limited by PSP #236
Changes from 12 commits
7ddde6a
6b231cc
cb23586
37b7b5f
b899bf9
dbef60c
e10af70
a464dbb
cbca5d6
a5fe18d
30e7a44
0aad8f4
ca9893e
5591867
694763c
566bbca
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of doing all the match regexp, why not passing a boolean in the struct request of the workflow ?
It will prevent in the future some errors if the schedule suffix is changed no ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see any documents that guarantee that they will keep this naming convention, so I guess you are right. My latest commit modifies the request struct to include the periodicity.