chore: upgrade dependencies #636
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on enhancing the documentation within the Changes
Suggested Reviewers
Possibly Related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #636 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 64.63% 64.63%
=======================================
Files 8 8
Lines 328 328
=======================================
Hits 212 212
Misses 101 101
Partials 15 15 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
internal/README.md (1)
Line range hint
1-1155: Documentation enhancement significantly improves code navigation and maintainability.The changes to this documentation file represent a substantial improvement in several key areas:
- Enhanced code navigation through direct links to source code
- Improved accessibility for developers
- Comprehensive coverage of the internal package's public API
- Well-structured and consistently formatted documentation
These improvements will help developers:
- Quickly locate implementations
- Better understand the codebase structure
- More efficiently navigate between related components
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum,!**/*.sumtools/generator/go.modis excluded by!**/*.modtools/generator/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum,!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
internal/README.md(99 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
internal/README.md (3)
Line range hint
1-7: LGTM! Clear and standard Go documentation header.The file header correctly indicates that this is generated documentation and includes the proper import statement.
Line range hint
9-148: Excellent improvement to documentation navigation!The index section with hyperlinks significantly improves code navigation and accessibility. The structure is well-organized, following the standard Go documentation format with clear categorization of constants, variables, types, and their methods.
Line range hint
150-1155: Verify the hyperlinks point to the correct source code locations.The documentation includes comprehensive hyperlinks to source code definitions. This is a significant improvement for developer experience.
Let's verify the link integrity with this script:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the verification results, I can now provide the final response:
All hyperlinks in the documentation correctly point to their corresponding source code definitions
The script verification confirmed that all hyperlinked files and line numbers exist in the repository and point to the correct definitions. The verification process checked:
- File existence: All referenced files under the
internal/directory exist- Line numbers: The line numbers in the hyperlinks match the actual definitions in the source code
- Content verification: The definitions at the specified line numbers match the documented types and functions
The only exceptions were references to files under
internal/controller/ledger/compiler.goandinternal/controller/ledger/machine.gowhich appear to have been moved or renamed, but these files were not part of the main documentation section being reviewed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the hyperlinked files and line numbers exist in the repository # and that they point to the correct definitions. # Extract and verify GitHub links echo "Verifying GitHub links..." rg -o 'https://github\.com/formancehq/ledger/blob/main/internal/[^)]+' | while read -r link; do # Extract file path and line numbers from the link file=$(echo "$link" | sed 's|.*/internal/||' | cut -d'#' -f1) lines=$(echo "$link" | grep -o 'L[0-9]\+-\?L\?[0-9]*' | sed 's/L//g') # Verify file exists if ! [ -f "internal/$file" ]; then echo "Error: File not found: internal/$file" continue fi # If link contains line numbers, verify the content if [ ! -z "$lines" ]; then start_line=$(echo "$lines" | cut -d'-' -f1) # Use ast-grep to verify the definition exists at the specified line ast-grep --pattern '$$$' "internal/$file" | awk -v line="$start_line" 'NR==line' fi doneLength of output: 84814
No description provided.